“Trump lawyer’s payment to porn star draws comparisons to John Edwards case”

Politico: The key legal question is whether the $130,000 was intended to advance Trump’s chances in the election. If it was, it should not have been routed through a corporation and might amount to an illegally large campaign contribution. If … Continue reading →

FOLLOW ORIGINAL ARTICLE HERE:
http://electionlawblog.org/?p=98083
Election Law Blog
Rick Hasen


http://electionlawblog.org/

Related Posts

“These Are the Ads Russ...

“Voter ID: The New Rule...

The Latest Campaign Spend...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

CommentLuv badge